![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||
|
IntroductionThe military historian, Dr David Chandler wrote [Chandler pp535]:
Much of the myth has come down to us in the form of eye- washing, by nineteenth-century battle painters, and brainwashing by some military historians who, even up to the present day, consider that men, horses, artillery and wagons can go dashing around a battlefield covered by almost a meter of snow, in temperatures of -16c, while intermittent blizzards raged. Trying to piece together the individual events of
this great battle is rather like attempting to unravel a tangled fishing
line; just when you think you have found the correct loop to pass it
through, the whole lot gets even more entwined. Dealing with the battle
as a whole, therefore, is not the object of this paper, but by focusing
our attention on one of the grand moments during its course, in this
case Murat's massive cavalry charge, we may come to understand just how
complex, and at times how fabricated Napoleonic battles could be.
Graham J. Morris
|
|||||||
|
||||||||