![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
||||||
|
The Myth and The GloryWith the above being said, such armchair prose as:
are pure nonsense, and are typical of writers who have probably never walked through a meter of snow, never mind riding 'full out' over a battlefield covered with the stuff! Other examples are all too easy to find:
and,
There are many more like these which I am sure the reader has been inspired by in imagining the panoply of battle; the truth however is that what we see in films, and what the war gamer can do with his uncomplaining miniature armies is very different to what takes place during a real battle. Even the most diligent and painstaking military historian normally succumbs to flowery prose, especially when writing some work that will appeal to the general reader as well as the academic: in many cases there are just causes for some elaboration, but if we wish to find the truth, then we must cut away the flowers and get down to the roots. If the military historian can manipulate our way of
thinking then how much more so the military artist? Nineteenth century
battle painters, although producing some uplifting scenes of military
glory did, by and large apply too much artistic license to many of their
works. The splendid craftsmanship of the French military painter,
Edouard Detaille will be forever associated with the Napoleonic legend,
but even his meticulous brushwork covers the truth with a veneer of
glorious improbabilities. The fact that he used the same composition on
at least two paintings, one of the French Guard Cavalry at Eylau, and
the other that of French Carabiniers during the Russian campaign of
1812, should make us wary of his historical data. In the painting
of the French Grenadiers a Cheval at Eylau, Detaille shows the stalwart
Grenadiers receiving Russian cannon fire in firm ranks wearing only
their tunics, with their cloaks still rolled on their portmanteaus. They
stand in a few centimeters of snow mounted on sweating horses while
their commander, Colonel Lepic tells his troopers to hold their heads up
saying that they are being assailed by cannonballs not turds. All of
this is of course very heroic stuff (or is it, when the cream of the
French army appear to be afraid of being killed?), but we must not
forget that it aims to show the glory of French arms, and was painted
not long after France had been defeated in the Franco-Prussian war and
therefore needed some kind of uplifting experience. The other problem
with this painting comes from the interpretation that we give to just
what Lepic actually said, and indeed if it was at all possible for his
men to hear him anyway with a howling wind blowing and with his back to
most of them! Also it may have been that the Grenadiers were not ducking
their heads to avoid Russian cannonballs, but merely lowering them from
the cutting effect of the wind and snow stinging their eyeballs! ‘The Battle of Eylau’ L. Flameng Yet another painter who puts his skills to good use in the form of artistic propaganda is L.Flameng, whom even David Chandler considers to give, 'A romantic reconstruction of Murat's famous cavalry charge' [Chandler pp246-247]. In this epic battle scene Flameng depicts Murat at the head of the French Cuirassiers, dressed in Russian Boyar type garb, wielding a riding whip and mounted on a rearing horse. We see tails, manes and horsetail plumes flapping in the wind, whereas, in fact, this whole hairy mass would have been, if not frozen stiff, at least incapable of this type of movement. Again we see the French cavalry without the protection of their winter cloaks, while their Russian adversaries, many of whom look like old age pensioners, stand in huddled amazement in their greatcoats awaiting their fate. As with Detaille we are presented with an image of French cavalry greatness; mounted on what appear to be prime racehorses, they are seen charging "full out" in a few centimeters of snow with no apparent effects from the appalling conditions under which they have spent the night, but rather as if they have just come from a full-dress parade. ‘The Charge of the Grenadiers a Cheval, Eylau 1807’. F Schommer The work of another military artist, F. Schommer
also shows the French Guard Grenadiers a Cheval charging (sic) into
battle, once again they are dressed for a ride in the park, and once
again they dash across a sprinkling of snow which seems to have
collected more on their bearskin bonnets than on the ground. It really
is a shame that we have let ourselves be hoodwinked by this type of sham
battlefield reporting. The facts may not have been quite what the salons
of Paris desired to put on their walls, but nevertheless the use of
rhetoric, and flowing brush strokes should not sanitize the dirty,
bloody truth of war. |
|||||||
|
||||||||